Christians, Desmond Tutu & Jew Hatred

Christian Icons of Propaganda – Sabeel and Desmond Tutu

If only these “Men of G-d” would care about the plight of Christians being slaughtered by the very groups they support!

Tutu & Catholic-Episcopal Bishops of Boston

Tutu & Catholic-Episcopal Bishops of Boston

Posted in Anti-Semitism, BDS, Christianity, CORRUPTION, Desmond Tutu, End Times, ISRAEL, Israel Boycott, Jerusalem, Liberal Agenda, New Caliphate, New World Order, Post America, Terrorism, Walid Shoebat | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

U.S. Backed Terrorists in Major Syrian Victory

U.S. Backed Terrorists Celebrate in Idlib

U.S. Backed Terrorists Celebrate in Idlib

We’ve rattled on about this many times before, most recently in our post: Should the U.S. Embrace A.Q. in Syria?
A very few commentators i.e. the Shoebat family, are honest and informed writers who have chosen the difficult task of fighting the ignorance of uninformed Americans with the truth about U.S. support for terrorists who are intent on committing genocide of the Christians (and Jews) of the Middle-East.  Most “Bloggers” and so-called “Experts” (Michael Totten et al ) are merely ignorant blow-hards, happy to re-write Administration hand-outs without any critical thinking or original thought. 
For the past several years we’ve suffered a succession of fools who have demanded U.S. funding for the vicious Jew hating, Christian murdering, “Moderate Rebels” in Syria.  A few brave souls such as Walid Shoebat and [Ex-CIA] Clare Lopez  have warned the public that the “Rebels” are in fact, mainly Al Qaeda or ISIS… not many listened.

Here’s the latest from the leadership that the U.S. has spent BILLIONS training and arming.

[ Salim Idris (born c. 1957) is the former Chief of Staff of the Supreme Military Council (SMC) of the Free Syrian Army, which is the main Syrian armed opposition group. ]

Salim Idriss comes out of closet-smlAnd now we have “Breaking News” from the Jabhat al-Nusra headquarters.

Al-Qaeda affiliate claims capture of Syrian city of Idlib

Al Nusra CelebrateJabhat al-Nusra fighters and other Islamist groups are pictured tearing down statues of Bashar al-Assad in key provincial city
Al-Qaeda’s Syrian affiliate and other Islamist fighters seized the Syrian city of Idlib on Saturday, according to a monitoring group and statements posted on supporters’ Twitter accounts.
It is the second provincial capital to fall into rebel hands, following the capture of Raqqa by the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (Isil).
It was reportedly seized by a coalition of fighters from Jabhat al-Nusra – al-Qaeda’s Syrian arm – and other Islamist factions, including Ahrar al-Sham and Jund al-Aqsa, in a sign of the country’s chaotic and complex conflict.
The city had been the scene of fierce fighting for four days and its fall came as Ban Ki-moon, the United Nations secretary-general, expressed anger and shame at the world’s failure to end four years of conflict.
Rami Abdel Rahman, director of the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, told AFP: “There is still a group of soldiers fighting in the security quarter of the city, but they will not be able to reverse the situation.”

The city’s position close to the highway connecting Damascus with the commercial capital Aleppo, as well as its proximity to President Bashar al-Assad’s stronghold in Latakia, makes it a key strategic prize.

Al-Nusra Front announced its victory on social media.

“Thanks be to God, the city of Idlib has been liberated,” it wrote on Twitter.

The group also posted photos of fighters in front of a government building, the city council and a police station while videos showed men tearing down posters of the president.

#NusraFront played vital role in #Idlib takeover. W/ its wide influence & support, the AQ group may possibly announce emirate in Idlib.

More than 215,000 people have been killed since anti-government protests erupted in March 2011, prompting a crackdown on foreign terror squads. Within months the demonstrations had grown into civil war.

Meanwhile, Mr Ban described his disappointment at the continuing violence.

“I confess to you my anger and my shame,” he told an Arab summit in Egypt.

The West is All Wrong About Syria

Discover the Covert Origins of ISIS

Former CIA Officer: “ISIS were trained by the United States in Jordan”

 Syrian rebel city welcomes US ambassador with roses (2011)

Syrian government criticises Robert Ford for meeting ‘saboteurs’ in Hama and conspiring to undermine regime

Posted in "Jabhat al Nusra ", Caliphate, Christianity, Genocide of Christians, Ghassan Hitto, Iraqi Christians, ISIL, ISIS, Islam, ISRAEL, John Kerry Arabist, John McCain, McCain's Heroes, Middle East Christians, New Caliphate, Sharia Law, Syrian Christians, Terror Funding, Walid Shoebat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Should the U.S. Embrace A.Q. in Syria?

  Here we go again.  Every few weeks some self-appointed “Terrorism expert”, demented Senator from Arizona, or television news “Anchor” babbles on about the “good rebels”, “Freedom fighters” or “Terrorists with legitimate grievances”

Anyone who has been paying attention, even a little bit, realises that “McCain’s Heroes” or the media’s “Freedom Fighting” rebels, are known to the secular Arabs and Christians of the Middle-East as the Islamic State or Al Qaeda.  The oft stated goal of these murderous militias is the genocide of Christians and the destruction of Israel….followed by the Islamisation of the United States of America. In spite of the promises by Islamic jihadis currently fighting against the secular government of Syria, to over-run Western democracies, our media and politicians continue to misrepresent the U.S. engineered chaos in the Middle-East as some sort of internecine struggle between equally savage factions. The truth is, the majority secular and Christians of the Middle-East are being slaughtered by groups of well armed Islamic savages, funded and supported by the U.S. and their Turkish and Qatari “allies”.

The latest witless creature to come out in support of the Islamic barbarians in Syria and Iraq is Lina Khatib, the Director of the Carnegie Middle East Centre, a well funded and over rated think tank based in Beirut Lebanon. The Carnegie Centre specialises in cramming Pro-Muslim Brotherhood, anti-Western, “Post-Colonial” B.S. down the throats of ill-informed, gullible, Western clients. Ms. Khatib’s latest bit of pro-jihadi rubbish is an effort to have us embrace the Al Qaeda franchisee “Jabhat al Nusra ” as the path to peace in the Middle East. (John McCain should sue Carnegie for plagiarism and theft of anti-intellectual property) Those in the Media who fantasise of a “reformed Islam” will love this!

Muzzie Ground hog-002The Nusra Front’s Game-Changing Rise in Syria

“When we finish with Assad, we will fight the U.S.!” one Nusra fighter shouted in the northeastern Syrian city of Ras al Ayn"

“When we finish with Assad, we will fight the U.S.!” one Nusra fighter shouted in the northeastern Syrian city of Ras al Ayn”

Lina Khatib Director Middle East Center

The Nusra Front, al-Qaeda’s affiliate in Syria, has neither the wealth nor the weapons of its rival, the self-proclaimed Islamic State. But it is rising in strength and popularity and, as of late March 2015, the group is poised to take over the city of Idlib, in northwestern Syria.

The West currently sees the Nusra Front as a threat. But Nusra’s pragmatism and ongoing evolution mean that it could become an ally in the fight against the Islamic State, as became clear during interviews I conducted with Nusra and Islamic State affiliates and supporters along the Turkish-Syrian border in late February 2015.

Although the province of Idlib is already dominated by Nusra, the urban center of the governorate remains under the control of the Syrian regime. But in late March, the Nusra Front and its allies (like Ahrar al-Sham and other Syrian rebel brigades that make up the alliance known as the Islamic Front) managed to nearly encircle the city, with the exception of just one thoroughfare.

If the Nusra Front succeeds, Idlib would become the second urban center lost by President Bashar al-Assad’s regime since the start of the Syrian war in 2011. The regime has already taken several steps in response to the threat. It orchestrated the assassination of leaders of the Nusra Front in the province in early March. When that did not deter Nusra, the regime moved its administrative offices from the city of Idlib to Jisr al-Shoghour, to the southwest, in an attempt to minimize its losses. It has simultaneously intensified its use of barrel bombing in the area; humanitarian agencies operating in the province have been distributing chemical kits in reaction to what they say is the regime’s use of chlorine in some of the bombs.

Aid agencies estimate that the escalation of violence that is expected to take place as a result of the Nusra takeover and the subsequent regime reaction will result in the movement of some 100,000 residents, the highest number of internally displaced persons moving at once in Syria since the start of the conflict, according to a senior aid officer I spoke with.

Rivalry With the Islamic State

The Nusra Front was the strongest Islamist actor in Syria at the end of 2013. But it soon found itself facing another powerful force: the Islamic State. The leaders of the Islamic State engaged in—and won—numerous ideological battles with Nusra, challenging its religious legitimacy while also assassinating many of its leaders.

Military success, the air of ideological legitimacy, as well as vast human and material resources helped to transform the Islamic State into the wealthiest terrorist organization in the world, which allowed it to recruit more fighters, seize more land, and increase the intensity of its attacks on Nusra. As a result, for most of 2014, the Nusra Front appeared to be weakening. But in October 2014—shortly after the start of the U.S.-led international coalition’s airstrike campaign against the Islamic State and the Nusra Front in Iraq and Syria—the group began to display new vigor.

Nusra’s lifeline was not granted overnight. Its pragmatism has meant that what it lacked in military capability, ideological attraction, and resources, it gradually made up for with human capital.

The human dimension of Nusra’s work on the ground in Syria cuts across several issues, but the group’s approach to ideology is at its heart. Despite sharing similar views with the Islamic State, Nusra does not impose its ideology wholesale. While local sources say 80 percent of the Islamic State’s adherents in Syria are not Syrians, Nusra members are mostly Syrian and therefore more aware of regional variations in culture and customs. This allows Nusra to modify the implementation of ideology according to those variations, making it more popular than the Islamic State among Syrians.

Despite that, the vast majority of those who support Nusra are not driven by ideology, but by anti-Assad sentiment. The Islamic State did not regard fighting the Syrian regime as a priority until after its advance on Mosul, Iraq’s second-largest city, in June 2014, when the regime began to attack it for the first time. But the Nusra Front has consistently fought the regime throughout its existence. The relative weakness of the Free Syrian Army (FSA), a network of anti-Assad forces, and its lack of adequate international support have made the Nusra Front, in the eyes of many Syrians, the only credible actor fighting the regime and the only one that is actually able to deliver results. Indeed, Nusra’s victories relative to its size and resources make it the most effective group currently engaged in the Syrian conflict.

Building Alliances and Fighting Corruption

The Nusra Front’s ability to deliver results is largely driven by its pragmatism. The group has been collaborating with a wide variety of local forces that are not pushed to fight under its umbrella. Instead, they fight with Nusra as allies—a radical departure from the Islamic State’s model, which does not tolerate collaboration unless absolutely necessary.

This approach has enabled the Nusra Front to widen its network of support quickly, including the addition of some Free Syrian Army brigades in Aleppo, Hama, and Daraa. Crucially, Nusra engages in friendly competition with Ahrar al-Sham, which has recently become the largest group under the Islamic Front umbrella following its merger with another Islamic Front faction, the Suqour al-Sham Brigades. This development has made Ahrar al-Sham almost as large as the Nusra Front, and the alliance between the two could become an important factor in the Syrian conflict.

Nusra also learned from the mistakes of both the regime and the Free Syrian Army. In northern Syria, people saw the corruption of the regime replaced with that of brigades fighting under the banner of the FSA, such as the Syrian Revolutionaries’ Front, which imposed inconsistent taxes on the population, established checkpoints at which its members regularly seized people’s property, and controlled food supplies.

Nusra used the anticorruption framework to win hearts and minds. People quickly began to see FSA checkpoints replaced with Nusra checkpoints that “did not demand anything in return for protecting us,” as one Nusra supporter said in an interview. The Nusra Front also used the fight against corruption to justify its attacks on uncooperative FSA brigades. Nusra’s assault on the Syrian Revolutionaries’ Front in late 2014 won wide popular support, despite the fact that the main aim of the attack was actually to eliminate one of Nusra’s key military rivals.

The Nusra Front also noticed that FSA leaders in the north who had become warlords abandoned the front lines, and Nusra ensured that its leaders remained in the field. This presence underscored the idea that the Nusra Front was providing protection—military as well as social—and vastly increased its acceptance among ordinary Syrians.

While not everyone likes Nusra’s ideology, there is a growing sense in the north of Syria that it is the best alternative on the ground—and that ideology is a small price to pay for higher returns. “The one who defends me has the right to impose whatever law they see fit,” one sympathizer told me.

The international coalition’s airstrikes that began in September 2014 took Nusra by surprise, but they further increased the group’s popularity. Many Syrians felt disappointed that the West did not act against the Assad regime, but instead attacked an entity that was fighting the regime. Many rallied around Nusra, providing local support and contributing to its intelligence-gathering capabilities. This allowed Nusra to increase the areas under its control not through territorial gains or the provision of services—methods the Islamic State uses to extend its reach—but through expanded local networks and influence.

All this enabled Nusra to vastly increase its power in the north, as it took over most of Idlib and sought to destroy rival brigades under the pretext of fighting corruption or fighting the West. This was seen again in its late February 2015 raid on the Hazm Movement—the first FSA brigade to receive weapons from the United States—which has since disbanded.

An Opportunity for the West

The Islamic State is not an immediate target for Nusra. Both groups are focusing their energies on fighting the Syrian regime as well as the FSA, and they have avoided direct encounters with one another. In Aleppo, the two groups have deliberately allowed an area between them to remain under the control of the regime and serve as a buffer zone.

But both groups are racing to become the strongest actor in Syria. While the city of Idlib, with only 400,000 inhabitants, is relatively small, its takeover would give Nusra a significant morale boost. That would help the Nusra Front to attract more brigades and give it an edge over the Islamic State, which controls the other urban center—Raqqa—but does not have any allies.

Nusra’s pragmatism means that it wants to be represented at the table when a political deal on Syria is formulated, and that, coupled with Nusra’s popularity, is why it is a more significant threat to the regime than the Islamic State.

Qatar, which is seeking to boost its influence in Syria, has been watching Nusra’s rise and trying to detach Nusra from al-Qaeda. (Qatar’s motivation lies within its own ambition to use the Nusra Front as a winning card in international discussions about a settlement for the Syrian conflict.) Nusra cannot completely abandon al-Qaeda’s ideology for fear of losing legitimacy. But it has displayed flexibility in its application of this ideology, and it has now become the strongest component of al-Qaeda, to the extent that without Nusra, al-Qaeda’s future would be precarious, limited to significant influence only in Yemen through al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula. Ahrar al-Sham is even less severe in its application of ideology than Nusra. If their alliance continues—as is likely given Nusra’s pragmatism—it would have a tempering effect on the evolution of al-Qaeda’s ideology and its implementation.

Instead of putting Nusra and the Islamic State in the same basket, the West should look beyond the Nusra Front’s ideological affiliation and encourage its pragmatism as it seeks an end to the Syrian conflict.

 Read more at:

Posted in "Jabhat al Nusra ", Al Nusra, Caliphate, Child Soldiers, Christianity, CIA, DEFENCE, Genocide of Christians, Ikhwan, Iraqi Christians, ISIL, ISIS, Islam, ISRAEL, John Kerry, John McCain, McCain's Heroes, Middle East Christians, Muslim Brotherhood, New Caliphate, New World Order, Sharia Law, Syria, Syrian Christians, Terror Funding | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

South Africa’s Nuclear Stockpile

While America is preoccupied with Angelina’s latest surgery, Bruce Jenner’s quest for WTF status or  that 350-Pound Armed Robber that Held Up DOMINO’S… , this dangerous world is becoming even more threatening….  our politicians and their media lap dogs are completely silent.
Of course, discussing the “Rainbow Republic of South Africa” in less than deferential terms (I’ve been there, so don’t even try to sugar-coat that dreadful place to me) is not to be attempted in the Post American world, but screw everyone….. S.A. is poised to become an Iranian style menace to civilised man and a nuclear supermarket.

South Africa refuses to give up Cache of weapon-grade UraniumSouth Africa’s Pelindaba Nuclear Research Center stores nearly a quarter ton of uraniumSouth Africa’s Pelindaba Nuclear Research Center stores nearly a quarter ton of uranium

According to various reports, back in 1990, the South African government at the time extracted the country’s inventory of highly enriched uranium from its nuclear weapons, then melted the fuel before storing it in a silver vault at the Pelindaba nuclear research center. The Pelindaba center is located just thirty minutes away from Pretoria, the country’s administrative capital.

According to a report in HomeLand Security News Wire, over the years, some of the nuclear fuel had been used to produce medical isotopes. Nevertheless, roughly 485 pounds of the fuel remain there.

The United States has expressed concerns over the safety of South Africa’s nuclear cache. In November 2007, the research center’s security was breached when two teams of raiders entered the fenced perimeter. One group eventually broke into the center’s central alarm station. Thankfully, both teams were caught when a watch officer called in additional security personnel. Nevertheless, the episode has been a source of contention between South African and U.S. officials.

South African president Jacob Zuma has rejected incentives from the Obama administration to get rid of his country’s nuclear-weapons fuel. In a letter dated August 2011, Obama warned Zuma that a terrorist nuclear attack would constitute a “global catastrophe.

President Obama further proposed that South Africa transform its nuclear explosives into benign reactor fuel with U.S. support. Had Zuma agreed, the White House would have announced the deal at a 2012 summit dedicated to nuclear security, which was indeed held in South Korea. President Zuma rejected the proposal at the time. He also rejected other proposals and overtures from the Obama administration regarding South Africa’s nuclear fuel.

According to a report by the The Washington Post, the United States is partially responsible for South Africa’s nuclear cache. Between 1956 and 1965, the Americans had helped the country build its first nuclear reactor under the ’Atoms for Peace program’. The United States also trained scientists to run the South African reactor with U.S.-supplied weapons-grade uranium fuel.

Washington cut off its fuel supply to South Africa In 1976, under the Ford administration. This was after it concluded that the South African Apartheid regime was busy developing a clandestine bomb program – without informing the US.

Posted in African War, DEFENCE, EMP, End Times, iran nukes, Islamic Bomb, Multi-National Terrorism, New World Order, Nuclear Proliferation, South Africa, Terror Funding, Terrorism | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

John Bolton: “Bomb Iran”

To Stop Iran’s Bomb, Bomb Iran


Posted in DEFENCE, Genocide, Hassan Rouhani, iran nukes, Islam, Islamic Bomb, ISRAEL, Israel Air Force, Israel Boycott, Israel Defence Forces, Israeli Technology, Jerusalem, John Bolton, John Kerry, New Caliphate, New World Order, OBAMA, Post America | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

US to Allow Iranian Centrifuges at Fordo

Iran may run centrifuges at fortified site

iran1a-640x401LAUSANNE, Switzerland (AP) — The United States is considering letting Tehran run hundreds of centrifuges at a once-secret, fortified underground bunker in exchange for limits on centrifuge work and research and development at other sites, officials have told The Associated Press.

The trade-off would allow Iran to run several hundred of the devices at its Fordo facility, although the Iranians would not be allowed to do work that could lead to an atomic bomb and the site would be subject to international inspections, according to Western officials familiar with details of negotiations now underway. In return, Iran would be required to scale back the number of centrifuges it runs at its Natanz facility and accept other restrictions on nuclear-related work.

As negotiations stand, the number of centrifuges would grow to more than 6,000, when the other site is included. Olli Heinonen, who was in charge of the Iran nuclear file as a deputy director general of the U.N’s International Atomic Energy Agency until 2010, says even 6,000 operating centrifuges would be “a big number.”

Asked of the significance of hundreds more at Fordo, he said, “Every machine counts.”

Read the Rest Here


Posted in Bibi Netanyahu, DEFENCE, iran nukes, Islam, Islamic Bomb, ISRAEL, Israel Air Force, Israel Boycott, Israel Defence Forces, Israeli Technology, John Kerry, John Kerry Arabist, New World Order, Post America, Terror Attacks | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Obama’s War on Israel: Another Stab in the Back

Obama’s War on Israel, a Very Dangerous Move.

Israel has never, ever, threatened a nuclear strike against another nation, yet the Obama Administration is again stirring the moral equivalency pot, obviously to appease his “Iranian allies” and legitimise the Islamic Republic’s quest for nuclear weaponry. The release of these documents is nothing less than U.S. outsourcing of their dream of the destruction of Israel, to the Mullahs of Iran.

US Declassifies Document Revealing Israel’s Nuclear Program

dimona_237693kObama revenge for Netanyahu’s Congress talk? 1987 report on Israel’s top secret nuclear program released in unprecedented move.

In a development that has largely been missed by mainstream media, the Pentagon early last month quietly declassified a Department of Defense top-secret document detailing Israel’s nuclear program, a highly covert topic that Israel has never formally announced to avoid a regional nuclear arms race, and which the US until now has respected by remaining silent.

But by publishing the declassified document from 1987, the US reportedly breached the silent agreement to keep quiet on Israel’s nuclear powers for the first time ever, detailing the nuclear program in great depth.

The timing of the revelation is highly suspect, given that it came as tensions spiraled out of control between Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and US President Barack Obama ahead of Netanyahu’s March 3 address in Congress, in which he warned against the dangers of Iran’s nuclear program and how the deal being formed on that program leaves the Islamic regime with nuclear breakout capabilities.

Another highly suspicious aspect of the document is that while the Pentagon saw fit to declassify sections on Israel’s sensitive nuclear program, it kept sections on Italy, France, West Germany and other NATO countries classified, with those sections blocked out in the document.

The 386-page report entitled “Critical Technological Assessment in Israel and NATO Nations” gives a detailed description of how Israel advanced its military technology and developed its nuclear infrastructure and research in the 1970s and 1980s.

Israel is “developing the kind of codes which will enable them to make hydrogen bombs. That is, codes which detail fission and fusion processes on a microscopic and macroscopic level,” reveals the report, stating that in the 1980s Israelis were reaching the ability to create bombs considered a thousand times more powerful than atom bombs.

The revelation marks a first in which the US published in a document a description of how Israel attained hydrogen bombs.

The report also notes research laboratories in Israel “are equivalent to our Los Alamos, Lawrence Livermore and Oak Ridge National Laboratories,” the key labs in developing America’s nuclear arsenal.

Israel’s nuclear infrastructure is “an almost exact parallel of the capability currently existing at our National Laboratories,” it adds.

“As far as nuclear technology is concerned the Israelis are roughly where the U.S. was in the fission weapon field in about 1955 to 1960,” the report reveals, noting a time frame just after America tested its first hydrogen bomb.

Institute for Defense Analysis, a federally funded agency operating under the Pentagon, penned the report back in 1987.

Aside from nuclear capabilities, the report revealed Israel at the time had “a totally integrated effort in systems development throughout the nation,” with electronic combat all in one “integrated system, not separated systems for the Army, Navy and Air Force.” It even acknowledged that in some cases, Israeli military technology “is more advanced than in the U.S.”

Declassifying the report comes at a sensitive timing as noted above, and given that the process to have it published was started three years ago, that timing is seen as having been the choice of the American government.

US journalist Grant Smith petitioned to have the report published based on the Freedom of Information Act. Initially the Pentagon took its time answering, leading Smith to sue, and a District Court judge to order the Pentagon to respond to the request.

Smith, who heads the Institute for Research: Middle East Policy, reportedly said he thinks this is the first time the US government has officially confirmed that Israel is a nuclear power, a status that Israel has long been widely known to have despite being undeclared.

Posted in Bibi Netanyahu, CIA, CORRUPTION, DEFENCE, Hassan Rouhani, iran nukes, Islam, Islamic Bomb, ISRAEL, Israel Air Force, Israel Boycott, Jerusalem, OBAMA | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment