Fact sheet on asylum is very useful; largest number of ‘new’ Americans are Chinese

America’s largest border is it’s 350+ International Airports. 40% of “visitors” who fly into the USA never intend to leave (Visa overstay)and there is no mechanism to track the overstays.
No matter how many criminal aliens cross the Mexican-US border, the number of those who fly into the country remains far, far greater.

It Was a Suspected ‘Birth Tourism’ Site. Then Came Late-Night Screams.

Day Care Worker Stabs 3 Infants and 2 Adults in Queens, Police Say

Birth Tourism Update – Edición “Anclaje de bebé”

The Birth Tourism Business Made Easy

Refugee Resettlement Watch

A couple of days ago I reportedon the Asylum process which is part of the Refugee Act of 1980.  The difference from the US Refugee Admissions Program is that these wannabe ‘refugees’ are already in the US usually illegally and they claim they will be persecuted if returned home.

It is a huge backlog of cases that is concerning the Trump Administration and is why they say that a 30,000 cap on the refugees the UN/US State Department bring in to the country is all we can handle.  I assume they are expecting more than the 20,000-30,000 asylum seekers who have been approved each year for the last ten will grow with their stepped- up processing.

I have no time to snip this Fact Sheet from the American Immigration Council on ‘Asylum in the US,’ but you will find it answers many of your questions.

Although AIC is a…

View original post 155 more words

Advertisements
Posted in Anchor Babies, Birth Tourism, Cannibalism, Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

750 “faith” groups and “faith” leaders tell the President that they want 75,000 additional third worlders admitted to US beginning October first

Tick tock

Refugee Resettlement Watch

They cite their “collective scriptural mandate” as the reason for their demands that you, the American taxpayer, pay for their ‘religious’ charity.

Honestly, this is probably one of the most maddening aspects of this subject—-why on earth do they think the Bible says that government must take care of the poor?

Why can’t these “faith” leaders find ways to take care of the impoverished in the world (starting in their own towns!) using their own money!

(Or they can volunteer to help the third world in the third world!)

greek refugees Your new neighbors? I had to laugh about the photo the Christian Post uses to illustrate this news.  Do these ‘refugees’ in Greece make you want to invite them home?  Where is the photo of  mothers and babies? And, why is one guy laughing?  Maybe because they fooled these Europeans!

Is your church lobbying the President? See below….

View original post 5,616 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

What do refugee criminals cost taxpayers?

Recommended reading:
Trump is Right: Criminal Aliens Are Protected Species http://wp.me/p2iCeU-1lx

Refugee Resettlement Watch

It is a question I have asked many times over the years!

Whenever I see a news story with some glowing report about how refugees financially benefit the communities in which they are placed, I suspect that all the costs to society are never calculated. 

For instance….

Costs like remittance dollars sent out of the US economy (a story for another day!)? Cost of interpreters for myriad obscure languages? Complete cost of educating the children? Costs associated with elderly and infirm refugees? And, the cost of crime, of courts, of prison time!

Victorville High security federal prison, Victorville, in California where an Uzbek refugee attempted to murder the prison warden!

We have had a bunch of refugee crime stories lately including the Iraqi alleged terrorist found living in California, the Iraqi who shot a police officer in the head in Colorado, the Uzbek sentenced for trying to kill the prison warden…

View original post 374 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Spanish Radio station to beam Chinese Propaganda

via Spanish Radio station to beam Chinese Propaganda

Quote | Posted on by | 1 Comment

John Quincy Adams on “American Exceptionalism”

I admit to being befuddled and quite frankly saddened, by the state of this Republic and her “residents” (most do not deserve the unearned flattery of being regarded as “citizens”) as they continue to turn their backs on the unique heritage bequeathed by the Founding Fathers.

A mere two years after the tumultuous election of Donald Trump we remain a country that clings to ridiculous “Never Trump” narrative spewed out 24-7 by corporate media taking heads and bloviating radio talk show personalities such as Mark Levine, Hugh Hewitt etc. who remain opposed to everything promised by President Trump during the presidential campaign. The same U.S. “residents” who concoct graphics showing, as they did with G.W.Bush, the American president as a modern Christ, remain tireless supporters of the Obama-Clinton narrative regarding foreign affairs and the Balkanisation of these [formerly] United States.

The profound ignorance of the population and their willingness to toss away every Right and Liberty, paid in blood by the Founders, in exchange for corrupt government controlled by favoured monopolies and international corporations, should have the Founding Fathers spinning in their graves.

Watching the fake news on the fake T.V channels (Fox-News, MSNBC, CBS, ABC etc) and witnessing the residents of this formerly great nation lapping it up, is the motivation for my re-post of the article below. I don’t expect much, after all, even self proclaimed “Patriots” know very little about the U.S. Constitution or the goals of America’s Founders.

Here we go again.

Why quit our own [interests] to stand upon foreign ground? Why, by interweaving our destiny with that of any part of Europe, entangle our peace and prosperity in the toils of European ambition, rivalship, interest, humour or caprice?

’Tis our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances, with any portion of the foreign world.  George Washington- Farewell Address, 19 September 1796

 

John-Quincy-Adams

John Quincy Adams on “American Exceptionalism”

John Quincy Adams, while secretary of state, delivered an Independence Day speech in the House of Representatives on July 4, 1821. If the “inventors of Congreve rockets and Shrapnel shells” should enquire as to what “America has done for the benefit of mankind,” Adams said, “Let our answer be this: America, with the same voice which spoke herself into existence as a nation, proclaimed to mankind the indistinguishable rights of human nature and the only lawful foundations of government.” But the Declaration of those truths did not impose upon our nation the duty to enforce them all over the world. The United States had over half a century, Adams observed, “respected the independence of other nations while asserting and maintaining her own. She has abstained from interference in the concerns of others, even when conflict has been for principles to which she clings, as to the last vital drop that visits the heart.”

America, said Adams, “goes not abroad in search of monsters to destroy. She is the well-wisher to the freedom and independence of all. She is the champion and vindicator only of her own.” Our nation’s  “glory is not dominion, but liberty. Her march is the march of the mind. She has a spear and a shield: but the motto upon her shield is, Freedom, Independence, Peace. This has been her Declaration: this has been, as far as her necessary intercourse with the rest of mankind would permit, her practice.”

It is a practice that the America of our time has long since abandoned. And the costs, in blood, treasure, and further chaos in lands where our bombs and bullets have failed to bring “peace and stability,” have yet to be fully calculated. But there is yet another cost, one that cannot be measured in dollars or even in lives. America seeking dominion over other nations, Adams warned, “might become the dictatress of the world: she would be no longer the ruler of her own spirit.”

http://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/history/item/18633-american-exceptionalism-true-and-false

American politician, 6th President of the United States (in office from 1825 to 1829)
Posted in End of Empire, Founding Fathers, John Quincy Adams | Tagged , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Siraj Wahhaj’s Family In Desert Disgrace

Masjid Al-Taqwa in Bedford Stuyvesant-Brooklyn New York    Run by unindicted co-conspirator Siraj Wahhaj 

While Siraj Wahhaj, leader of the Muslim Alliance of North America, enjoys the relative luxury of his well protected Bed-Stuy martial arts compound/mosque, it has been revealed that his own family have been living a less than Stone Age “lifestyle” in the barren desert of New Mexico!

Sheriff’s Department raids Amalia compound

Missing child was not found

During their search of an Amalia, New Mexico, home Friday (Aug. 3) Taos County Sheriff’s officers found one suspect, multiple weapons, 11 children — who were living in filth — but no missing 3-year-old.

According to to a Sheriff’s Office press release, following a two-month investigation — in conjunction with Clayton County, Georgia and FBI investigators — Sheriff Jerry Hogrefe swore out an affidavit for a search warrant Thursday (Aug. 2) based on his belief that a makeshift compound — surrounded by tires and an earthen berm in Costilla Meadows subdivision — was occupied by 39-year-old Siraj Wahhaj, who was wanted for abducting 3-year-old AG Wahhaj.

Siraj Wahhaj and Lucas Morten, both from Georgia are now in custody. Eleven children ages one to 15 were taken into protective custody and later turned over to New Mexico Children Youth and Families Department (CYFD) for their own health and safety. Three women, believed to be the children’s mothers, were also detained as investigators continue to sort out details of the case.

Sheriff Hogrefe said the FBI had recently provided information and surveillance on the property, “but they (FBI) didn’t feel there was enough probable cause to get on the property.

That all changed for me when a message was forwarded to us from a Georgia Detective that we reasonably believed came from someone at the compound – the message sent to a third party simply said… ‘we are starving and need food and water.’

“I absolutely knew that we couldn’t wait on another agency to step up and we had to go check this out as soon as possible, so I began working on a search warrant right after I got that intercepted message. It had to be a search warrant and a tactical approach for our own safety because we had learned the occupants were most likely heavily armed and considered extremists of the Muslim belief.

“We also knew from the layout of the compound they would have an advantage if we didn’t deploy tactfully and quickly.”

Friday morning, eight members of Sheriff’s Response Team (SRT) were assisted by the State OSI unit when they executed the search warrant.

The “all day” operation went without major incident or any injuries, though Wahhaj and Morten initially refused to follow verbal direction and Wahhaj was heavily armed with an AR15 rifle, five loaded 30 round magazines, and four loaded pistols, including one in his pocket when he was taken down. Many more rounds of ammo were found in the makeshift compound that consists of a small travel trailer buried in the ground covered by plastic with no water, plumbing, or electricity.

“The only food I saw were a few potatoes and a box of rice in the filthy trailer,” Hogrefe said. “But what was most surprising, and heartbreaking, was when the team located a total of five adults and 11 children that looked like third world country refugees with no food or fresh water, no shoes, and basically dirty rags for clothing.”

AG Wahhaj, the missing child who is also from Georgia, was not located among the children.

Wahhaj and Morten were arrested; Wahhaj was booked on his no-bond Georgia warrant for child abduction and Morten was charged with harboring a fugitive.

The women were detained for questioning and later released pending further investigation while all 11 children were immediately taken in protective custody and later turned over to the state CYFD division.

“We all gave the kids our water and what snacks we had,” Hogrefe said. “It was the saddest living conditions and poverty I have seen.”

None of the adults would give statement to the current whereabouts of AG Wahhaj, but it is known he was there a few weeks ago. The investigation into locating him is ongoing with coordination efforts from Clayton County Georgia and FBI investigators.

 

Posted in Ikhwan, Islam, Muslim Brotherhood, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 6 Comments

The Post American Reality- “Progressive or Regressive”?

When Corrupt Politicians and Corporate Media Tyrants operate under a cloak of absolute immunity and only America’s “Peasant Class” are subject to consequences for their conduct and actions, the Republic becomes a relic of the past.

Progressive Regression

By | July 30th, 2018

Donald Trump has certainly changed the rules of presidential behavior, through his nonstop campaign rallies, tweets, and press conferences. What his critics call lowering the bar of presidential decorum by unfettered and often crude invective, Trump dubs the “new presidential.”

His style has become a sort of “don’t-tread-on-me” combativeness. In truth, Trump at home and abroad is mostly retaliatory. His theory seems to be that no slight should go unanswered. When Trump retorts in kind or trumps the original attack, he believes he adds yet another brick to his wall of deterrence—and exposes the sometimes dormant and disguised irrational hatred of the Left.

But what the Left loses in its slugfests with Trump are some once-supposed cherished leftist principles, justified by the short-term advantage of nullifying the Trump agenda.

Indeed, it is eerie that almost all the canons of progressive orthodoxy no longer apply. And they will no longer be taken seriously after Trump is long gone. Certainly, those lost principles will be impossible to reassert when Democrats return to power and seek sanctuary in the very ideas they have now so utterly trashed.

Liberals, who now warn of Trump’s “war on the press” long ago excused Eric Holder’s monitoring of the Associated Press reporters and Fox News’s James Rosen. And they had no problem with John Brennan lying under oath when he claimed the Obama CIA had not monitored the computers of Senate staffers (he would lie brazenly again under oath about drone collateral damage and his role in seeding the Steele dossier).

Likewise, they snoozed after Director of National Intelligence James Clapper lied to Congress in his denial of government surveillance of U.S. citizens. Both were seen at the time to be useful liars. Their partisanship and exemption from any consequences for past lying under oath led to lucrative cable news gigs—proof, as it were, of their innate Trump hatred. Their legacy is that lying under oath now is not a sin, much less illegal.

So Much for Civil Liberties
When Trump appeared on the national scene, an all-out assault on civil liberties followed, in a manner that is now irrevocable. The Left destroyed for good the idea that progressives are the protectors of constitutional freedoms.

If fear of Trump, some connected with the National Security Council under Obama helped to surveil American citizens, unmasked them, and leaked their names to the press. The press, hand-in-glove, complied in spreading such unsubstantiated dirt.

Former National Security Advisor Susan Rice flat out lied in her denial about her involvement in unmasking. The Obama FBI and Justice Department officials deliberately misled FISA courts, on the premise that spying on American citizens even with flimsy or fabricated evidence was OK—if it at least neutered the Trump candidacy and presidency. Had they just told judges something like, “We present, as justification for these warrants of surveillance, opposition research compiled on candidate Donald Trump, and paid for by Hillary Clinton during the present campaign,” they likely would never have been able to spy on American citizens.

No one again will have much confidence either in the FISA courts or any rationale for spying on any American citizen. They will logically assume FISA requests are political efforts to spread dirt on the opposition—in the fashion that we now have no idea, in the era after Lois Lerner, what prompts an IRS letter in our mail. The legacy of the Obama Administration is that if one is not progressive and loud in the public sphere, he may well be monitored, audited, or investigated.

Reputations Stained Beyond Repair
The FBI may not recover its reputation. Certainly, the brand of its Washington office is shredded. Watching new Director Christopher Wray stumble about to reassure us about his reforms inspires about as much credulity as a pre-war French general touting the invincibility provided by the Maginot Line.

The Left more or less has canonized a parade of disreputable FBI officials. Peter Strzok violated almost every canon of professional conduct, in his personal comportment, in his blatant prevarication about his own text messages, and in his dogged pride in his conflicts of interest in using his authority to pursue a political agenda. His superior Andrew McCabe, according to the inspector general, likewise lied on several occasions.

So did former Director James Comey when he denied under oath the prominent role of the Steele dossier in FISA warrant applications. Leaking a classified government memo with the expressed intent of prompting a special counsel investigation is not what FBI directors do. Nor do they deliberately set up a president by not informing him that base accusations against him are the result of opposition campaign hit pieces, subsidized in part by the FBI.

FBI directors do not politicize investigations, in the manner Comey warped his conduct toward Hillary Clinton on the rationale she would be elected. Comey alone has pretty much destroyed any idea that in the near future the FBI Washington office can again be trusted to be disinterested.

Add in the conduct of Lisa Page and various other FBI officials—James Baker especially—who have either resigned or been reassigned. FBI apologists on the Left are excusing the very weaponizing behavior that they used to rant about in the days of J. Edgar Hoover—who, we think at least, never sought to alter the outcome of a U.S. election.

The Left is fine with the idea that the FBI, with a wink and nod from the CIA, can insert spies into an ongoing presidential campaign, on the rationale that embarrassing information might be collated, leaked, and thus useful to “insure” that a supposedly dangerous man would not be president. Should a right-wing FBI do the same with a candidate Bernie Sanders, reminding us that Sanders went to Moscow on his honeymoon and therefore was under suspicion, what would the Left say?

Any notions of conflict of interest are gone. The Obama Justice Department, FBI, and CIA destroyed that concept entirely. When Loretta Lynch met Bill Clinton on the tarmac in the course of investigations about his wife’s likely illegal behavior or the Justice Department and FBI gave immunity to Clinton’s top aides after making false statements, all credibility was shot.

Justice Department official Bruce Ohr communicated with a political campaign’s opposition research team that had hired his own wife. The deputy FBI director Andrew McCabe oversaw the Hillary Clinton email investigation shortly after his wife had received hundreds of thousands of dollars in campaign donations from Clinton-related political action committees. Rod Rosenstein was knee-deep in the Uranium One investigation, the Clinton email investigation, the FISA warrant applications, and the Trump-collusion mythologies. He should have been recused long ago. If Rosenstein was not recused, there is now no such thing as an idea of recusal at all.

Liberals do not care much whether Bill Clinton received a $500,000 honorarium in Moscow or that Russian interests gave millions to the Clinton foundation shortly before Hillary Clinton urged the government to approve the sale to them of 20 percent of U.S. uranium.

If there is someday a special counsel appointed to monitor the possible illegality of the Obama FBI, Justice Department, CIA and NSC, and many of its legal team proves to be Trump donors, and a few of them are found out to be veteran counsels for Trump-related defendants, or two members are caught texting their hatred for Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton and bragging how they had schemed to stop such a 16-year envisioned Obama-Clinton continuum, apparently no one is going to complain of any “bias” or conflict of interests.

More Norms Annihilated
Is there still any notion of a confidential lawyer-client special relationship or disdain for stealthily taping private conversations of a client? Apparently not. Former Clintonite Lanny Davis knows the Left saw nothing wrong when the FBI seized legal records from Trump’s attorney Michael Cohen or that lawyer Cohen taped the phone calls of his own unknowing client Trump. Instead, the Left’s shrug is that if Trump was stupid enough to hire such a creepy rake, then he deserves what he gets—legal precedent and civil liberties be damned.

It used to be a progressive truism that “words matter”—as in the warning not to give voice to violent things because they may happen just because you said them. Actually, words today no longer matter at all. If they did, Madonna, Johnny Depp, Kathy Griffin, Robert De Niro, or Peter Fonda would all be socially ostracized for their threats of bodily violence to the president of the United States or his family. God forbid that such eliminationism rhetoric will spill over to the next Democratic presidency. But if it should, the Left has now lost all moral authority to condemn it.

By the same token, there is no longer any accepted limitation on presidential hate speech. No one will have a problem with calling any president a Nazi, the new Hitler, an abject traitor, treasonous, or his conduct tantamount to the mass death of Pearl Harbor, 9/11 or the Holocaust. Those who compare Trump to the worst monsters of history regularly appear on cable news and enjoy vast Twitter and social media audiences. I fear theirs will be the new standard: For every Trump Hitler who killed 6 million, we will one day hear of a new anti-Trump Stalin who killed 20 million. All one now needs to say is “President X or President Y is a threat to the United States, and so deserves what he gets.”

Security Clearances-as-First Amendment Right
We have also established a new code of behavior for ex-security and intelligence officers.

From now on, they will really never leave office. Instead, their opposition to the new administration begins the moment they become private citizens—while drawing on and sometimes monetizing their vestigial security clearances to enhance their invective against the sitting president.

Imagine the following: that as soon as Trump leaves office, a paid Fox News contributor Mike Pompeo or Dan Coates begins trashing nightly newly inaugurated President Elizabeth Warren as despicable, treasonous, or the worst something in the history of America—while still privy to some of top-secret communications of her administration. And they will wink and nod at their clearances as proof of their seriousness and of direct conduits to “sources tell me” gossip. To question why they would do so or expect security clearances at all will earn cries from Republicans of “enemies list!”

There is no longer any sense of public and private first families. If Barron Trump can be smeared and ridiculed in print and cartoons, if the president can be accused of incest with his daughter by mainstream reporters, if the first lady can be demonized as everything from an illegal alien to a former call girl, no first family is off limits. The next time a Democratic president takes office, any call for “restraint” or “have you no decency” to recreate the bubble that once protected the Obama family would be laughed at—and understandably so.

Endless Unchecked and Unaccountable Investigations
Special counsels will have no restraints. They will be sacrosanct Roman tribunes about whom any criticism will be tantamount to unpatriotic behavior. They can ignore their original mandate and wander wherever they wish on the principle that they have found their criminal and need only find the crimes by which to destroy him.

The special counsel will stock his team with partisans who hate the object of his investigation, with law firm cronies who share his views. If he fires one or two of them, he will hide the reasons for their departures and stagger their severance to avoid the appearance that they were connected—in the style of belatedly and separately disclosing the career ends of Lisa Page and Peter Strzok.

From now on, the accusation that a president is a traitor, a colluder, a lackey, a pimp, a whatever of the Russians, or a dupe of the Chinese, or of who knows what else, will be an accepted way to help stall an opposition administration, to smear it as unpatriotic, to use any low means necessary to achieve a supposed high end of destroying it.

Just watch soon what the Left has birthed. Thucydides, writing more than 2,400 years ago about the civil strife on the island of Corcyra, observed that “men too often take upon themselves in the prosecution of their revenge to set the example of doing away with those general laws to which all alike can look for salvation in adversity, instead of allowing them to subsist against the day of danger when their aid may be required.” They are not going to like the results when in their “day of danger” they cry foul and no one listens.

Content created by the Center for American Greatness, Inc. is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a significant audience. For licensing opportunities for our original content, please contact licensing@centerforamericangreatness.com.

Posted in New World Order, Police Statism, Post America, Post-American Slavery, Progressives, Victor Davis Hanson | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment