A Realist’s Plan To Eradicate ISIS (The Islamic State)

The Only Solution To The ISIS Siege of Arab Lands


Crucifixion in Iraq

By Martin Weinstein Tel Aviv Israel

Let’s be realistic, and let’s get serious.

The only realistic solution to the growing jihadist siege of the Middle-East is to allow those who truly understand the situation to take over the defence of the region.

The United States has a responsibility to assist in bringing calm to the region, because the United States for whatever misguided reasons or misconceptions, was the engine that propelled the expansion of the murderous Islamic militias during the last 10 years.

As seen in CNN’s dramatic footage of Iraqi and Kurdish troops dropping desperately needed supplies and rescuing Yazidi refugees from Mt Sinjar, regional authorities are more than capable of confronting the “Islamic State” as long as they are free from [U.S.] interference and are assured of material support from the West.

The United States could, and should, provide air-cover for Kurdish and Iraqi ground operations. If this is too distasteful for the Islamists in the Administration (and their Republican Guards i.e. McCain, Graham, Hagel, Brennan etc.) then the U.S. should step aside and let the Syrians, Jordanians and Saudis take charge of the battlefield.

Whatever the decision regarding U.S. support for the anti-ISIS forces, the Administration should, at the very least, man-up and recognise their responsibility for encouraging the chaos that has engulfed the region. The U.S. should enact an immediate “no-fly zone” over Turkey and Qatar to cut off supplies to the ISIS and Al Qaeda forces. There should also be a maritime quarantine of those terror-supporting nations. The recent 11 Billion dollar weapons sale to Qatar should be irrevocably cancelled and a ban on future sales enacted.

On paper, the United States provided $200 million worth of arms to the Kurdish forces TEN YEARS AGO! The arms were never delivered due to objections by Turkish Sultan Erdogan

Sultan Erdogan’s Turkey and the terror-haven of Qatar have fulfilled Washington’s need for plausible deniability in Obama’s foreign policy. Through these radical Islamist regimes the U.S. was able to send arms and recruit Islamist fighters for America’s covert war against the secular Syrian government. 

This must stop!

Why haven’t the Arab countries (or Israel) intervened to prevent the spread of ISIS and AL Qaeda?

They have!

Responding to attacks by ISIS on their borders, Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Syria used air-power to repel the murderous Islamist forces. The response from Washington was to threaten those who defended their borders (sound familiar?) and demand that these sovereign nations cease all operations against ISIS.

Kerry issues warning after Syria bombs Iraq



BAGHDAD (AP) — Syrian warplanes bombed Sunni militants’ positions inside Iraq, military officials confirmed Wednesday, deepening the concerns that the extremist insurgency that spans the two neighboring countries could morph into an even wider regional conflict. U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry warned against the threat and said other nations should stay out.

Meanwhile, a new insurgent artillery offensive against Christian villages in the north of Iraq sent thousands of Christians fleeing from their homes, seeking sanctuary in Kurdish-controlled territory, Associated Press reporters who witnessed the scene said.

The United States government and a senior Iraqi military official confirmed that Syrian warplanes bombed militants’ positions Tuesday in and near the border crossing in the town of Qaim. Iraq’s other neighbors — Jordan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and Turkey — were all bolstering flights just inside their airspace to monitor the situation, said the Iraqi official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak to the media.

American officials said the target was the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, the Sunni extremist group that has seized large swathes of Iraq and seeks to carve out a purist Islamic enclave across both sides of the Syria-Iraq border.

“We’ve made it clear to everyone in the region that we don’t need anything to take place that might exacerbate the sectarian divisions that are already at a heightened level of tension,” Kerry said, speaking in Brussels at a meeting of diplomats from NATO nations. “It’s already important that nothing take place that contributes to the extremism or could act as a flash point with respect to the sectarian divide.”

Meanwhile, two U.S. officials said Iran has been flying surveillance drones in Iraq, controlling them from an airfield in Baghdad. The officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to discuss the issue publicly, said they believe the drones are surveillance aircraft only, but they could not rule out that they may be armed.

A top Iraqi intelligence official said Iran was secretly supplying the Iraqi security forces with weapons, including rockets, heavy machine guns and multiple rocket launchers. “Iraq is in a grave crisis and the sword is on its neck, so is it even conceivable that we turn down the hand outstretched to us?” said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the subject.

The intelligence-gathering and arms supplies come on the heels of a visit to Baghdad this month by one of Iran’s most powerful generals, Qassem Soleimani, commander of the Revolutionary Guard’s Quds Force, to help bolster the defenses of the Iraqi military and the Shiite militias that he has armed and trained.

The involvement of Syria and Iran in Iraq suggests a growing cooperation among the three Shiite-led governments in response to the raging Sunni insurgency. And in an unusual twist, the U.S., Iran and Syria now find themselves with an overlapping interest in stabilizing Iraq’s government.

None-Arab and mostly Shiite, Iran has been playing the role of guarantor of Shiites in Iraq, Syria and Lebanon. It has maintained close ties with successive Shiite-led governments since the 2003 ouster of Saddam Hussein, a Sunni who oppressed the Shiites, and is also the main backer of Syria’s Assad, a follower of Shiism’s Alawite sect.

In a reflection of how intertwined the Syria and Iraq conflicts have become, thousands of Shiite Iraqi militiamen helping President Bashar Assad crush the Sunni-led uprising against him are returning home, putting a strain on the overstretched Syrian military as it struggles to retain territory recaptured in recent months from rebels.

Anthony Cordesman, a prominent foreign policy analyst at the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies, said that with Syria’s apparent willingness to now take on the Islamic State directly, “the real problem is how will Iran, the Iraqi Shiites and the Alawites in Syria coordinate their overall pressure on the Sunni forces?”

Qaim, where the Syrian airstrikes took place Tuesday, is located in vast and mostly Sunni Anbar province. Its provincial government spokesman, Dhari al-Rishawi, said 17 people were killed in an air raid there.

Reports that the Sunni militants have captured advanced weapons, tanks and Humvees from the Iraq military that have made their way into Syria, and that fighters are crossing freely from one side to the other have alarmed the Syrian government, which fears the developments could shift the balance of power in the largely stalemated fight between Assad’s forces and the Sunni rebels fighting to topple him.

Bilal Saab, a senior fellow for Middle East Security at the Atlantic Council’s Brent Scowcroft Center on International Security, said Assad’s immediate priority is to fight the rebels inside his own country.

“His army is already overstretched and every bullet that doesn’t hit enemy targets at home can be a bullet wasted,” he said. “Going after ISIL along border areas could serve tactical goals but is more a luxury than anything else.”

In Brussels, Kerry said Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki appears to be standing by his commitment to start building a new government that fully represents its Shiite, Sunni and Kurdish populations.

However, al-Maliki, in his first public statement since President Barack Obama challenged him last week to create a more inclusive leadership or risk a sectarian civil war, rejected calls for an interim “national salvation government .”

Al-Maliki has faced pressure, including from his onetime Shiite allies, to step down and form an interim government that could provide leadership until a more permanent solution can be found.

Al-Maliki, however, insisted the political process must be allowed to proceed following April elections in which his bloc won the largest share of parliament seats.

“The call to form a national salvation government represents a coup against the constitution and the political process,” he said. He added that “rebels against the constitution” – a thinly veiled reference to Sunni rivals – posed a more serious danger to Iraq than the militants.

Al-Maliki’s coalition, the State of the Law, won 92 seats in the 328-member parliament in the election, but he needs the support of a simple majority to hold on to the job for another four-year term. The legislature is expected to meet before the end of the month, when it will elect a speaker. It has 30 days to elect a new president, who in turn will select the leader of the majority bloc in parliament to form the next government.

More of Iraq’s sectarian tensions boiled over into violence on Wednesday, with Sunni militants shelling a Christian village 45 miles (75 kilometers) from the frontier of the self-ruled Kurdish region, which has so far escaped the deadly turmoil unscathed.

The shelling of the village of Hamdaniya sparked a flight by thousands of Christians from it and other nearby villages toward the Kurdish region. Hundreds of cars, many with crucifixes swinging from their rear-view mirrors, waited to cross into the relatively safe northern Iraqi Kurdish city of Irbil.

Others were forced to walk, including 28-year-old Rasha, who was nine months pregnant and carried her 3-year-old son on her hip. After her husband’s car broke down, the woman, who would give only her first name for fear of militant reprisals, and her mother-in-law walked for miles toward the checkpoint, fearful she would give birth before reaching safety.

Like most others, the women said they had nowhere to go, but hoped strangers would take them in in the Christian-dominated area.

“Otherwise we will sleep in a park,” Rasha said, shrugging.

Meanwhile, pro-government forces battled Sunni militants, threatening a major military air base in Balad, north of Baghdad, military officials said. The militants had advanced into the nearby town of Yathrib, just five kilometers (three miles) from the former U.S. base, which was known as Camp Anaconda. The officials insisted the base was not in immediate danger of falling into the hands of the militants.


The United States does not understand the Middle-Eastern neighbourhood well enough to risk “boots on the ground”, and past efforts to bribe Islamic militants with skate-rinks, body building parlours, shopping malls etc. have proved incredibly expensive and absolutely useless in the end. Arabs should fight Arabs on Arab terms. ISIS will be defeated in short order if the United States will allow the Middle East to be Middle Eastern.

Let the Arabs destroy ISIS. The United States can never do such a thing with their “Hearts and Minds”,  “Let’s set you up in business” approach.

The U.S. should enact an immediate “no-fly zone” over Turkey and Qatar to cut off supplies to the ISIS and Al Qaeda forces.

There should also be a maritime quarantine of those terror-supporting nations. The recent 11 Billion dollar weapons sale to Qatar should be irrevocably cancelled and a ban on future sales enacted.

ISIS is a rather small force in Middle-Eastern terms. Jordan and Syria have,  in the past, dealt with similar (PLO) forces in absolute terms.

One more thought: Stop the U.S. backed attempt to Islamise Syria! This disgusting effort by the U.S. government  is the engine that has propelled the ISIS-Al  Qaeda success in the region.

Martin Weinstein is an Israeli defence analyst specialising in Syrian and Iraq affairs.
This entry was posted in Al Nusra, Al Qaeda, Arms Deals, Caliphate, Child Rape, Chuck Hagel, CORRUPTION, DEFENCE, Genocide, Genocide of Christians, Hillary Clinton, Iraq, Iraqi Christians, ISIL, ISIS, Islam, John Brennan, John Kerry, John McCain, New Caliphate, Sharia Law, Syrian Christians, Terror Attacks, TURKEY, US Military, Yazidis and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to A Realist’s Plan To Eradicate ISIS (The Islamic State)

  1. Taylor says:

    excellent! Send it to the friendly media

  2. Pingback: A Realist's Plan To Eradicate ISIS (The Islamic State)

  3. Cam says:

    Impose a no-fly zone over independent, sovereign states, as well as maritime quarantine? So, to fight the Islamic State we are to implement what is essentially acts of war against Turkey and Qatar?

  4. Pingback: Obama’s Outreach to Terror-Supporter Sultan Erdogan | theflyingcameldotorg

  5. Skip Patel says:


    On January 17, 1961, in this farewell address, President Dwight Eisenhower warned against the establishment of a “military-industrial complex.”

    “Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American makers of ploughshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense; we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions.”

    “A vital element in keeping the peace is our military establishment. Our arms must be might, ready for instant action, so that no potential aggressor may be tempted to risk his own destruction. . . . American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But now we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense; we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. . . . This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. . . .Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. . . . In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. “

  6. Pingback: Israeli Defence Technology Rules the Battlefield | theflyingcameldotorg

  7. Pingback: The ISIS-Syria-Post American Relationship Explained | theflyingcameldotorg

  8. Pingback: New York Times: Obama’s Pravda | theflyingcameldotorg

  9. Pingback: Behind the Headlines: ISIS Threat to The United States | theflyingcameldotorg

  10. Pingback: Who Pays the Syrian-Iraqi Terrorists? | theflyingcameldotorg

  11. bill coleman says:

    Won’t happen with this muslim POTUS and will never happen unless the right candidate is nominated and elected in November 2016. What is the right way to get the right Gop candidate nominated?

  12. Pingback: Fmr. Israeli PM: The West Has It Wrong In Syria | theflyingcameldotorg

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s